Ending a retail or commercial lease should be a straightforward handover. But too often, it turns into a costly dispute over make-good, repairs, de-fit obligations, or alleged damage to the premises. Suddenly, your exit timeline, cash flow, and next site fit-out are all at risk.
If your landlord is insisting on excessive works or inflated costs, you’re not alone. Lease-end disputes are common across shops, offices and warehouses—especially where the lease and disclosure documents weren’t read together, or where handover standards were never clearly defined.
This guide explains what landlords can and can’t demand at the end of a retail or commercial lease, why these disputes arise, and how experienced lease dispute lawyers protect your business, negotiate fair outcomes, and keep your exit (or relocation) on track.
Once a tenant vacates, landlords often re-inspect with a “fresh eyes” lens—comparing the current condition against lease obligations rather than day-to-day operational realities. Disputes typically arise around:
If you’re a tenant facing unfair repair demands, our dedicated commercial lease lawyers in Gosford or Burwood can provide the legal guidance you need. Buckley Lawyers specialises in resolving lease disputes with strong local knowledge.
A Make-good clause in a lease represents the lessee’s obligation to return the property to a specific condition at the end of the lease. . Your legal argument hinges on the lease wording, any Agreement for Lease, the Disclosure Statement (for retail leases), and any correspondence between the parties.
Red flags we regularly see:
Commercial/retail leases usually use a bank guarantee or cash security, often coupled with personal guarantees for SMEs. That security can be used as leverage for landlords—but it can also be your bargaining chip:

We review the lease, disclosure statement, agreement for lease, fit-out approvals, side letters, entry photos and any landlord’s works during the term. We identify what the lease actually requires at handover—and what it doesn’t.
We separate lawful make-good from upgrades/improvements, quantify realistic costs, and push back on landlord overreach (e.g., full remodel disguised as “repairs”).
We negotiate pragmatic outcomes: a reduced works list, cash settlement caps, landlord self-perform (with cost limits), or staged works that don’t jeopardise your next site opening.
We resist improper bank guarantee drawdowns, seek releases on practical completion of agreed make-good, and aim to limit directors’ exposure under personal guarantees.
If negotiation stalls, we can explore mediation through the NSW Small Business Commissioner , or represent you at Court/NCAT where applicable. In such circumstances, we will provide you with clear advice and a costed list of alternatives to best resolve your matter.
For tenants in North Sydney and Chatswood, navigating lease disputes can feel overwhelming. That’s why our commercial lease lawyers in North Sydney and Parramatta offer tailored advice to safeguard your business and protect you from unnecessary repair costs.
For businesses, —make-good, downtime, lost security, delayed opening of your new site—can be costly . A focused legal strategy therefore can:
Final Thoughts
Lease exits shouldn’t sink your budget or delay your next opening. If a landlord is demanding excessive make-good, upgrades masquerading as repairs, or trying to hold your security, you have commercially strong options. The right legal team will narrow the scope to what the lease truly requires, negotiate a fair, cost-controlled exit, and protect your guarantees.
Need a fast, pragmatic strategy for your lease end? Get in touch with Buckley Lawyers for tailored advice on retail and commercial lease disputes, make-good negotiations, and security releases.
Do I have to “return to base building”?
Only if your lease says so. Many leases require removal of tenant works and reasonable reinstatement—not upgrades or brand-new base-building assets.
Landlord wants new carpet/paint throughout—can they insist?
Only where the lease requires it and the condition genuinely exceeds fair wear for the term/use. Otherwise, like-for-like repair or targeted reinstatement may be sufficient.
They’re threatening to call on my bank guarantee. What now?
A prompt legal response is important . We challenge improper drawdowns, offer a compliant make-good plan, or negotiate capped settlements so your guarantee is released to you.
We’re in a shopping centre with a retail lease. Does that change anything?
Yes. A Retail Lease must comply with the Retail leases Act 1994 (NSW) and the requirement of a landlord to provide a disclosure statement to the lessee often improves transparency and can support a more balanced outcome.
Is it best to simply pay the landlord what they want?
Not usually. Inflated make-good obligations can exceed the true scope by a wide margin. Obtaining the assistance of a lawyer commonly saves significant costs and preserves security.